Collin Johnson
The headlines have been going absolutely crazy the past few days about an air-related incident in India. An Air India jet fell out of cruise, injured two dozen people, and the captain later tested positive for cannabis. Both parts are true. You can probably assume where things go from there.
Here's the detail almost none of that coverage led with. The captain who tested positive was not flying the plane. The first officer was at the controls. The captain was standing behind him, and when the aircraft lurched, it threw him to the cockpit floor.
Flight AI2379 left Phuket on the morning of August 4 with 145 people on board. It was an Airbus A320neo, registered VT-EXO. Around 9:33 a.m. India time, cruising near 36,160 feet over the Odisha coast, the jet dropped roughly 300 feet in seconds. Twenty passengers and four cabin crew got hurt. The plane flew on for another hour and a half and landed safely in Delhi.
Air India first called it turbulence, then walked that back and described it as a sudden loss of altitude. Indian authorities labeled it a serious incident. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau is now leading the probe, with technical help from Airbus and France's air-safety agency.
And the technical picture is the part that got buried. The aircraft's fault log recorded nine warnings inside a single minute at around 9:32 a.m. All three of the A320's independent hydraulic systems registered a pressure loss almost at once. An A320 carries three hydraulic systems precisely so it never loses control of the surfaces that steer it. Airbus's own preliminary analysis, reviewed by Reuters, lays out the timeline down to the second. One system dropped just before 9:32:44 a.m., the other two failed a second later, and all three came back about seven seconds after that.
In that window, the plane pitched up and the flight controls stopped cooperating. For roughly four seconds, per Airbus, the elevators and ailerons were unusable. The first officer pushed full nose-down input and got nothing back from the control surfaces. Then the systems recovered, the aircraft dropped, and the captain hit the floor.
Airbus has not figured out why the hydraulic pressure vanished. It asked Air India to test the hydraulic systems and their sensors, pull some sensors for inspection, and check the airframe for damage, because the jet took forces beyond its design limits during the drop. Reuters put the bottom line plainly: no link has been established between the captain's drug test and the loss of altitude.
Let's be clear about what this is not. It is not a clean bill of health for the captain, who has been identified in Indian press as Sudeep Vashistha.
His post-flight screening came back non-negative, and a confirmatory test was positive for cannabis. Investigators grilled him for over an hour. He told them he had been sleeping badly for a while because of personal issues, that he slept poorly during the Phuket layover, and that he was taking medication his family doctor prescribed for it. He also admitted he slept for 30 to 35 minutes during the flight itself. He hasn't named the medication or said whether he declared it, which he's required to do under Indian aviation rules.
Both pilots have been pulled from flying while the investigation runs. Air India also started mandatory drug-and-alcohol screening across its entire pilot workforce on August 13, going beyond what regulators currently require. Whether a captain running on almost no sleep, on an undisclosed medication, with cannabis in his system, belonged in that cockpit at all is a fair and serious question. Investigators should ask it. That's just a different question from what made the airplane fall.
This article draws on reporting from Hindustan Times, Outlook India, Reuters, Business Standard, and The Tribune, and on analysis first published by High Times. Read the High Times piece at hightimes.com.
This is a clinic in how a true headline can still lie. Nobody had to write the word "caused." You just print "plane drops 300 feet" and "pilot tests positive for weed" under one headline, in that order, and the reader does the work for free. The problem is that the guy who tested positive had his hands nowhere near the controls. The first officer was flying. The captain was standing behind the seat and ended up on the floor. And the actual mechanical story, three hydraulic systems losing pressure at once and the flight controls going dead for four seconds. All of this info is sitting right there in Airbus's own analysis. Reuters said it flat out. No link has been established between the weed and the drop.
So why did cannabis lead the coverage and the hydraulics get buried? Because weed is the better villain. This is the same blunt instrument cannabis users have been beaten with for decades. A positive test proves exposure, not impairment, and not timing. It cannot tell you whether someone consumed an hour ago or three weeks ago. But here you don't even need that argument, and that's what makes this case so telling. You don't have to win a fight about toxicology. You just have to ask who was flying the plane. Now, the captain is not off the hook.
Sleeping in the cockpit, an undisclosed prescription, cannabis in his system, all of it deserves a hard look. With all of that in consideration, he may well have had no business in that seat. Fine. Investigate it. But if a positive weed test was worth the headline, then the name of the person actually flying the airplane was worth a sentence too. The fact that it usually wasn't tells you everything about how this industry still gets covered.
Membership gets you full episodes, behind-the-scenes, and more. Start with a free trial.
Start Your Free Trial